PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STMSX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STMSX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund (STMSX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STMSX achieves a 15.01% return, which is significantly higher than NASDX's 12.17% return. Over the past 10 years, STMSX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 9.31%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.08% annualized return.


STMSX

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.51%
6M
9.08%
YTD
15.01%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
9.31%
ALL TIME*
7.83%

NASDX

1D
0.59%
1M
-3.62%
6M
10.09%
YTD
12.17%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
16.19%
10Y*
21.08%
ALL TIME*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

STMSX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STMSX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund
15.01%8.67%13.34%12.97%-16.91%23.68%10.41%21.99%-12.34%15.89%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
12.17%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between STMSX and NASDX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.79

The correlation between STMSX and NASDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STMSX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STMSX
STMSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
STMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
STMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
STMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
STMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STMSX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund (STMSX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STMSXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

1.90

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

6.14

+3.00

STMSX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STMSX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STMSX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STMSX drawdown since its inception was -60.78%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STMSX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STMSXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.78%

-83.16%

+22.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-11.90%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.36%

-22.71%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.36%

-35.33%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-35.33%

-7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-7.59%

+5.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.56%

-34.18%

+23.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.67%

-0.91%

Volatility

STMSX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund (STMSX) is 3.60%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that STMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STMSXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

6.80%

-3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

15.94%

-3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

19.35%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.06%

23.53%

-0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.83%

22.87%

-0.04%

STMSX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STMSX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

STMSX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

STMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than NASDX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
3.21%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%
STMSX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund
3.60%4.41%21.88%3.11%0.84%9.68%0.29%2.54%9.26%1.89%0.41%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


STMSX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NASDX has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to STMSX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STMSX dropped -60.78% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

STMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STMSX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer