STLG vs. SBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

STLG (iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, STLG returned 33.27% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. STLG charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

STLG vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STLG achieves a 18.49% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.

STLG

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: 1.30%
• 6M: 15.03%
• YTD: 18.49%
• 1Y: 33.27%
• 3Y*: 29.83%
• 5Y*: 17.98%
• 10Y*: —

SBIT

• 1D: 5.38%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 58.27%
• YTD: 44.00%
• 1Y: 124.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STLG vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF	18.49%	21.49%	18.54%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	44.00%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between STLG and SBIT is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.41

Return for Risk

STLG vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STLG

STLG Risk / Return Rank: 63
STLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
STLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
STLG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
STLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
STLG Martin Ratio Rank: 65

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 52
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STLG vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STLG	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.41	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	2.05	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.25	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	2.60	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.29	5.92	+3.37

STLG vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STLG and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STLG vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STLG drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLG and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	STLG	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-91.35%	+60.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.69%	-47.94%	+34.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.03%	-77.15%	+74.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.29%	-68.83%	+61.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	21.04%	-17.45%

Volatility

STLG vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) is 7.32%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that STLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STLG	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.32%	22.98%	-15.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.86%	68.89%	-53.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.55%	88.51%	-68.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.29%	96.89%	-74.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.95%	96.89%	-72.94%

STLG vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

STLG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

STLG vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than SBIT's 3.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.97%	0.52%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF	0.27%	0.31%	0.38%	0.75%	1.85%	0.67%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STLG and SBIT in my portfolio?

STLG and SBIT have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STLG or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to STLG (7.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLG dropped -31.34% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, STLG or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 33.27% for STLG. On fees, STLG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, STLG has been the lower-risk option at 7.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STLG or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 33.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STLG or SBIT?

STLG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STLG or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.27% for STLG.

What is the main difference between STLG and SBIT?

STLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. STLG tracks Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for STLG and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.