PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STLD vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STLD vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STLD achieves a 36.75% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, STLD has outperformed T with an annualized return of 26.69%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.


STLD

1D
-2.13%
1M
-7.56%
6M
33.50%
YTD
36.75%
1Y
77.20%
3Y*
33.82%
5Y*
33.12%
10Y*
26.69%
ALL TIME*
16.08%

T

1D
0.64%
1M
2.62%
6M
-2.84%
YTD
-7.04%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
2.10%
ALL TIME*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STLD vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STLD
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
36.75%50.70%-1.99%22.75%60.14%71.42%12.46%16.78%-29.02%23.34%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.04%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between STLD and T is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 1996

0.23

Over the past year, the correlation between STLD and T has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STLD:

$33.24B

T:

$152.52B

EPS

STLD:

$9.38

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

STLD:

24.57

T:

7.19

PS Ratio

STLD:

1.77

T:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

STLD:

$19.01B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STLD:

$2.66B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

STLD:

$2.23B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STLD vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STLD
STLD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
STLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
STLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
STLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
STLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STLD vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STLDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.92

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

-0.46

+4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.26

-1.03

+11.29

STLD vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STLD and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STLD vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STLD drawdown since its inception was -87.05%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLD and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STLDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.05%

-64.15%

-22.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.88%

-28.89%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.66%

-28.89%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.20%

-32.01%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.46%

-42.35%

-26.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.30%

-21.57%

+3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.21%

-15.74%

-17.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.55%

12.94%

-5.39%

Volatility

STLD vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) has a higher volatility of 12.76% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 9.59%. This indicates that STLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STLDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.76%

9.59%

+3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.59%

19.91%

+7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.15%

23.72%

+11.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.11%

24.38%

+13.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.39%

23.92%

+15.47%

Dividends

STLD vs. T - Dividend Comparison

STLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than T's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STLD
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
0.89%1.18%1.61%1.44%1.39%1.68%2.71%2.82%2.50%1.44%1.57%3.08%
T
AT&T Inc.
6.58%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

STLD vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Steel Dynamics, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.20B
33.47B
(STLD) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


STLD and T have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STLD has higher volatility (12.76%) compared to T (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLD dropped -87.05% vs T's -64.15%.

STLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STLD and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer