STLD vs. NTR
STLD (Steel Dynamics, Inc.) and NTR (Nutrien Ltd.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — STLD in Steel, NTR in Agricultural Inputs. Over the past 5 years, STLD returned 36.27%/yr vs 4.44%/yr for NTR. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STLD vs. NTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLD achieves a 67.39% return, which is significantly higher than NTR's 10.35% return.
STLD
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 67.39%
- 6M
- 65.42%
- 1Y
- 117.36%
- 3Y*
- 40.23%
- 5Y*
- 36.27%
- 10Y*
- 29.92%
NTR
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 15.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- —
STLD vs. NTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 67.39% | 50.70% | -1.99% | 22.75% | 60.14% | 71.42% | 12.46% | 16.78% | -29.02% |
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 10.35% | 43.33% | -16.97% | -20.19% | 0.23% | 60.78% | 5.60% | 5.57% | -7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between STLD and NTR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between STLD and NTR has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
STLD:
$40.94B
NTR:
$32.57B
STLD:
$9.33
NTR:
$4.93
STLD:
30.30
NTR:
13.72
STLD:
2.19
NTR:
1.18
STLD:
4.47
NTR:
1.29
STLD:
$19.01B
NTR:
$27.76B
STLD:
$2.66B
NTR:
$8.66B
STLD:
$2.23B
NTR:
$6.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STLD vs. NTR — Risk / Return Rank
STLD
NTR
STLD vs. NTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STLD | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.11 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.81 | 0.72 | +5.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.49 | 1.87 | +17.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STLD vs. NTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLD drawdown since its inception was -87.05%, which is greater than NTR's maximum drawdown of -57.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLD and NTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STLD | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.05% | -57.80% | -29.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.33% | -21.97% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.66% | -32.82% | +4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.20% | -57.80% | +25.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -31.34% | +31.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.27% | -26.17% | -7.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.04% | 8.49% | -2.45% |
Volatility
STLD vs. NTR - Volatility Comparison
Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) at 6.45%. This indicates that STLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STLD | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.70% | 6.45% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.96% | 25.79% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.38% | 31.82% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.03% | 34.21% | +3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.31% | 33.99% | +5.32% |
Dividends
STLD vs. NTR - Dividend Comparison
STLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than NTR's 3.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 3.23% | 3.53% | 4.83% | 3.76% | 3.51% | 2.45% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 3.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 0.72% | 1.18% | 1.61% | 1.44% | 1.39% | 1.68% | 2.71% | 2.82% | 2.50% | 1.44% | 1.57% | 3.08% |
Financials
STLD vs. NTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Steel Dynamics, Inc. and Nutrien Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STLD vs. NTR - Profitability Comparison
STLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 763.22M and revenue of 5.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.7%.
NTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
STLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of 538.00M and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.
NTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported an operating income of 419.11M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
STLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a net income of 403.44M and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
NTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a net income of 129.19M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STLD and NTR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STLD has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to NTR (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLD dropped -87.05% vs NTR's -57.80%.
STLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STLD and NTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer