STLA vs. MKC
STLA (Stellantis N.V.) and MKC (McCormick & Company, Incorporated) are both stocks. STLA operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while MKC operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, STLA returned -13.09%/yr vs -9.29%/yr for MKC. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STLA vs. MKC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLA achieves a -36.91% return, which is significantly lower than MKC's -27.49% return.
STLA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- -36.91%
- 6M
- -41.68%
- 1Y
- -29.18%
- 3Y*
- -19.63%
- 5Y*
- -13.09%
- 10Y*
- —
MKC
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- -27.49%
- 6M
- -25.55%
- 1Y
- -31.93%
- 3Y*
- -16.44%
- 5Y*
- -9.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
STLA vs. MKC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLA Stellantis N.V. | -36.91% | -0.80% | -40.21% | 79.15% | -18.23% | 12.88% |
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | -27.49% | -8.33% | 13.97% | -15.68% | -12.65% | 5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between STLA and MKC is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2021 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
STLA:
$19.14B
MKC:
$13.19B
STLA:
-€0.43
MKC:
$6.10
STLA:
0.09
MKC:
1.85
STLA:
0.27
MKC:
1.89
STLA:
€186.57B
MKC:
$7.11B
STLA:
€86.70B
MKC:
$2.70B
STLA:
€3.43B
MKC:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STLA vs. MKC — Risk / Return Rank
STLA
MKC
STLA vs. MKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellantis N.V. (STLA) and McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STLA | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.80 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.85 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | -1.69 | +0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STLA vs. MKC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLA drawdown since its inception was -72.65%, which is greater than MKC's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLA and MKC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STLA | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.65% | -52.02% | -20.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.77% | -39.50% | -8.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.65% | -47.65% | -25.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.65% | -52.02% | -20.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.32% | -48.49% | -21.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.12% | -11.03% | -18.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.08% | 19.92% | +4.16% |
Volatility
STLA vs. MKC - Volatility Comparison
Stellantis N.V. (STLA) has a higher volatility of 13.76% compared to McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) at 6.12%. This indicates that STLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STLA | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.76% | 6.12% | +7.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.15% | 23.28% | +16.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.80% | 28.06% | +23.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.03% | 24.34% | +17.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.43% | 24.17% | +17.26% |
Dividends
STLA vs. MKC - Dividend Comparison
STLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | 3.80% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.32% | 1.81% | 1.44% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.53% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 1.91% |
STLA Stellantis N.V. | 0.00% | 14.26% | 12.66% | 6.32% | 7.90% | 2.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
STLA vs. MKC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stellantis N.V. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STLA vs. MKC - Profitability Comparison
STLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stellantis N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.43B and revenue of 38.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.6%.
MKC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 708.90M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.
STLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stellantis N.V. reported an operating income of 688.00M and revenue of 38.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.
MKC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 227.50M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
STLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stellantis N.V. reported a net income of 390.00M and revenue of 38.13B, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.
MKC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 54.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STLA and MKC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STLA has higher volatility (13.76%) compared to MKC (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLA dropped -72.65% vs MKC's -52.02%.
STLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STLA and MKC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer