PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGN vs. TIBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGN vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust (GGN) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGN achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 17.20% return. Over the past 10 years, GGN has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 8.97%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return.


GGN

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
2.39%
6M
4.60%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
14.19%
10Y*
8.97%

TIBIX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.98%
YTD
17.20%
6M
21.00%
1Y
39.22%
3Y*
26.55%
5Y*
16.27%
10Y*
12.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGN vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGN
GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust
2.39%48.19%9.59%15.01%6.80%17.41%-8.62%36.59%-19.53%9.54%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
17.20%37.01%13.48%18.28%-7.69%20.36%-0.40%18.01%-4.31%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GGN and TIBIX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2005

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGN vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGN
GGN Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGN Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGN Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBIX
TIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGN vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust (GGN) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGNTIBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

4.76

-3.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

6.84

-5.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.96

-0.75

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

7.48

-5.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.26

29.26

-24.00

GGN vs. TIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGN Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the TIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGN and TIBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGNTIBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

4.76

-3.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

1.47

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.94

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.76

-0.62

Drawdowns

GGN vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGN drawdown since its inception was -73.04%, which is greater than TIBIX's maximum drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGN and TIBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGNTIBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.04%

-48.88%

-24.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.80%

-5.39%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.80%

-9.23%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.08%

-20.79%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.04%

-34.85%

-18.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.66%

0.00%

-10.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.79%

-5.96%

-25.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.16%

1.38%

+3.78%

Volatility

GGN vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison

GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust (GGN) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) at 3.07%. This indicates that GGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGNTIBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

3.07%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.60%

6.98%

+11.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.81%

8.46%

+14.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

11.16%

+8.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.00%

13.50%

+9.50%

GGN vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGN has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGN vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison

GGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than TIBIX's 5.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGN
GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust
7.00%6.98%9.55%10.37%9.92%9.60%13.68%13.64%16.22%11.52%15.85%17.68%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
5.06%5.83%5.67%4.89%5.89%5.33%4.31%4.46%4.77%4.52%4.14%4.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGN and TIBIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGN has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to TIBIX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGN dropped -73.04% vs TIBIX's -48.88%.

TIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGN and TIBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer