PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STK vs. FELAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STK vs. FELAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STK achieves a 59.80% return, which is significantly lower than FELAX's 84.79% return. Over the past 10 years, STK has underperformed FELAX with an annualized return of 24.60%, while FELAX has yielded a comparatively higher 37.23% annualized return.


STK

1D
-0.19%
1M
17.70%
YTD
59.80%
6M
57.03%
1Y
116.50%
3Y*
37.51%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
24.60%

FELAX

1D
6.40%
1M
26.18%
YTD
84.79%
6M
82.64%
1Y
169.50%
3Y*
63.50%
5Y*
43.56%
10Y*
37.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STK vs. FELAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund
59.80%24.85%17.74%46.60%-30.36%48.63%25.39%52.73%-14.91%33.52%
FELAX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A
84.79%44.88%43.74%75.08%-35.07%57.50%43.57%63.76%-12.76%34.12%

Correlation

The correlation between STK and FELAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2009

0.66

The correlation between STK and FELAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STK vs. FELAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STK
STK Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
STK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STK Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STK Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FELAX
FELAX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FELAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FELAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STK vs. FELAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STKFELAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

1.72

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.12

12.18

-3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.55

47.41

-8.86

STK vs. FELAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STK Sharpe Ratio is 5.11, which is comparable to the FELAX Sharpe Ratio of 5.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STK and FELAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STKFELAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11

5.49

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

1.14

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

1.08

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.47

+0.28

Drawdowns

STK vs. FELAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STK drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, smaller than the maximum FELAX drawdown of -71.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STK and FELAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STKFELAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.74%

-71.33%

+29.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.84%

-14.66%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

-36.43%

+9.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.27%

-46.15%

+9.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.74%

-46.15%

+4.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

0.00%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-21.88%

+14.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.76%

-0.73%

Volatility

STK vs. FELAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) is 8.47%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX) has a volatility of 11.89%. This indicates that STK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STKFELAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

11.89%

-3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.91%

25.31%

-6.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.93%

32.52%

-9.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.10%

38.34%

-13.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.13%

34.69%

-8.56%

STK vs. FELAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STK has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FELAX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

STK vs. FELAX - Dividend Comparison

STK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than FELAX's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FELAX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A
3.77%6.96%7.02%3.40%3.32%4.34%4.51%1.00%20.15%9.67%0.36%10.71%
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund
4.72%7.38%16.02%6.70%12.62%8.48%6.79%7.86%14.88%11.82%9.87%10.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


STK and FELAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FELAX has higher volatility (11.89%) compared to STK (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STK dropped -41.74% vs FELAX's -71.33%.

FELAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.49 vs 5.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STK and FELAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer