STIP vs. VTP
STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - STIP tracks the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L) while VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STIP charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTP.
Performance
STIP vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STIP achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 1.55% return.
STIP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.18%
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STIP vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 2.04% | 1.86% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between STIP and VTP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STIP vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
STIP
VTP
STIP vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STIP | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STIP | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.31 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
STIP vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STIP drawdown since its inception was -5.50%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STIP and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STIP | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -1.92% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.30% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.99% | -0.52% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | — | — |
Volatility
STIP vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STIP | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46% | 3.26% | -1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.75% | 3.26% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.45% | 3.26% | -0.81% |
STIP vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
STIP has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STIP vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
STIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.30% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STIP and VTP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for STIP.
STIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
STIP tracks Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L), while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for STIP and 0.05% for VTP.
Find the right allocation for STIP and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer