PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
STIP vs. RINF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

STIP vs. RINF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) and RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - STIP tracks the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L) while RINF tracks the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, STIP returned 3.18%/yr vs 4.69%/yr for RINF. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STIP charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RINF.

Performance

STIP vs. RINF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STIP achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than RINF's 2.37% return. Over the past 10 years, STIP has underperformed RINF with an annualized return of 3.18%, while RINF has yielded a comparatively higher 4.69% annualized return.

STIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.03%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.18%

RINF

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.43%
YTD
2.37%
6M
3.08%
1Y
2.48%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
4.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STIP vs. RINF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF		2.04%6.03%4.77%4.63%-3.02%5.68%5.18%4.89%0.54%0.74%
RINF
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF		2.37%1.64%9.79%0.21%8.77%16.20%1.98%1.82%-0.79%-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between STIP and RINF is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2012

0.15

The correlation between STIP and RINF shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (3 years) to 0.16 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF

ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF

Often compared with STIP:
STIP vs. VTIPSTIP vs. TIPSTIP vs. SCHPSTIP vs. SCHOSTIP vs. BNDSTIP vs. SCHRSTIP vs. STPZ
Often compared with RINF:
RINF vs. COMM.LRINF vs. TUARINF vs. TYARINF vs. IEFRINF vs. IRVHRINF vs. TIPZRINF vs. SPY

Return for Risk

STIP vs. RINF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
STIP
STIP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
STIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
STIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
STIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
RINF
RINF Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RINF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RINF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RINF Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
RINF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
RINF Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STIP vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

STIPRINFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.23
0.56

+2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.59
0.82

+4.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.10

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.76

0.96

+5.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.37

1.83

+24.54

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STIP vs. RINF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STIP Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is higher than the RINF Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STIP and RINF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

STIPRINFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

0.56

+2.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

0.43

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.30

0.37

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.08

+0.99

Drawdowns

STIP vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STIP drawdown since its inception was -5.50%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STIP and RINF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

STIPRINFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-43.51%

+38.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.69%

-2.60%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.95%

-9.62%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.50%

-13.58%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.50%

-29.18%

+23.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.66%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.99%

-16.45%

+15.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

1.37%

-1.19%

Volatility

STIP vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) is 0.40%, while ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that STIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

STIPRINFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

1.19%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.99%

2.77%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46%

4.49%

-3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

12.82%

-10.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.45%

12.57%

-10.12%

STIP vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison

STIP has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

STIP vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison

STIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than RINF's 3.70% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RINF
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF		3.70%3.89%4.68%5.07%1.15%2.76%0.82%1.90%2.47%2.99%1.09%1.83%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF		4.30%4.11%2.62%2.84%6.04%4.15%1.40%2.06%2.44%1.59%0.89%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

STIP and RINF have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RINF has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to STIP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STIP dropped -5.50% vs RINF's -43.51%.

On 10-year performance, RINF leads with 4.69% vs 3.18% for STIP. On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, STIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RINF has performed better with a 4.69% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.

STIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 3.70% for RINF.

STIP tracks Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L), while RINF tracks FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for STIP and 0.30% for RINF.

STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STIP and RINF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer