STHH vs. TRUT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. STHH is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.

Performance

STHH vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STHH achieves a 184.91% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 15.16% return.

STHH

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 9.64%
• YTD: 184.91%
• 6M: 183.51%
• 1Y: 147.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRUT

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: 15.16%
• 6M: 13.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STHH vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	184.91%	0.43%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	15.16%	9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between STHH and TRUT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.60

Return for Risk

STHH vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 81
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 62

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STHH vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STHH	TRUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.81	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.37	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.88	—	—

Drawdowns

STHH vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and TRUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	STHH	TRUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-18.55%	-15.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.01%	-9.44%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.17%	-5.29%	-4.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	STHH	TRUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.17%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.69%	23.17%	+29.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.44%	23.17%	+28.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.44%	23.17%	+28.27%

STHH vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

STHH vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than TRUT's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.71%	0.69%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.20%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STHH and TRUT in my portfolio?

STHH and TRUT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, STHH or TRUT?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, STHH or TRUT?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for STHH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STHH or TRUT?

STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.20% for TRUT.

What is the main difference between STHH and TRUT?

They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 0.13% for TRUT.