STHH vs. TRUT
STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. STHH is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
STHH vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STHH achieves a 209.56% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 25.30% return.
STHH
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 45.30%
- YTD
- 209.56%
- 6M
- 210.55%
- 1Y
- 209.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STHH vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 209.56% | 0.50% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between STHH and TRUT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STHH vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
STHH
TRUT
STHH vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STHH | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STHH | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.44 | 2.39 | +2.05 |
Drawdowns
STHH vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STHH | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -18.55% | -15.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.46% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -5.17% | -5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.90% | — | — |
Volatility
STHH vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STHH | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.39% | 21.53% | +28.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.44% | 21.53% | +27.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.44% | 21.53% | +27.91% |
STHH vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STHH vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than TRUT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.55% | 0.69% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STHH and TRUT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for STHH.
STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.
They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for STHH and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer