STHH vs. TIME
STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and TIME (Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. STHH is passively managed, while TIME is actively managed. Over the past year, STHH returned 209.77% vs 23.44% for TIME. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.
Performance
STHH vs. TIME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STHH achieves a 209.56% return, which is significantly higher than TIME's 9.82% return.
STHH
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 45.30%
- YTD
- 209.56%
- 6M
- 210.55%
- 1Y
- 209.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIME
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STHH vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 209.56% | 16.74% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | 9.82% | 23.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between STHH and TIME is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between STHH and TIME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STHH vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank
STHH
TIME
STHH vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STHH | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.31 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | 1.80 | +4.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | 6.63 | +7.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STHH | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20 | 1.78 | +2.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.44 | 0.80 | +3.64 |
Drawdowns
STHH vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and TIME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STHH | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -24.26% | -9.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.89% | -13.09% | -20.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.74% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -5.60% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.90% | 3.55% | +11.35% |
Volatility
STHH vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison
STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a higher volatility of 20.33% compared to Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) at 3.48%. This indicates that STHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STHH | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.33% | 3.48% | +16.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.77% | 10.14% | +26.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.39% | 13.27% | +37.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.44% | 17.62% | +31.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.44% | 17.62% | +31.82% |
STHH vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison
STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
STHH vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison
STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than TIME's 9.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.55% | 0.69% | 0.00% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | 9.12% | 10.02% | 15.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STHH and TIME have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STHH has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to TIME (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STHH dropped -33.89% vs TIME's -24.26%.
On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 209.77% vs 23.44% for TIME. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 209.77% return vs 23.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.
TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.12%, compared with 0.55% for STHH.
They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Clockwise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 1.00% for TIME.
STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STHH and TIME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer