STHH vs. KNCT
STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and KNCT (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return while KNCT tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, STHH returned 209.77% vs 99.38% for KNCT. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for KNCT.
Performance
STHH vs. KNCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STHH achieves a 209.56% return, which is significantly higher than KNCT's 63.41% return.
STHH
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 45.30%
- YTD
- 209.56%
- 6M
- 210.55%
- 1Y
- 209.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNCT
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 26.38%
- YTD
- 63.41%
- 6M
- 62.53%
- 1Y
- 99.38%
- 3Y*
- 43.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.42%
STHH vs. KNCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 209.56% | 16.74% |
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 63.41% | 37.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between STHH and KNCT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025 | 0.61 |
The correlation between STHH and KNCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STHH vs. KNCT — Risk / Return Rank
STHH
KNCT
STHH vs. KNCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STHH | KNCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.76 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | 10.00 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | 44.01 | -29.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STHH | KNCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20 | 4.70 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.44 | 0.58 | +3.86 |
Drawdowns
STHH vs. KNCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum KNCT drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and KNCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STHH | KNCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -57.18% | +23.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.89% | -9.99% | -23.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.63% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -10.74% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.90% | 2.27% | +12.63% |
Volatility
STHH vs. KNCT - Volatility Comparison
STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a higher volatility of 20.33% compared to Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) at 9.19%. This indicates that STHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STHH | KNCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.33% | 9.19% | +11.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.77% | 17.12% | +19.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.39% | 21.28% | +29.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.44% | 23.19% | +26.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.44% | 22.97% | +26.47% |
STHH vs. KNCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than KNCT's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
STHH vs. KNCT - Dividend Comparison
STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than KNCT's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.57% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.55% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STHH and KNCT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STHH has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to KNCT (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STHH dropped -33.89% vs KNCT's -57.18%.
On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 209.77% vs 99.38% for KNCT. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, KNCT has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 209.77% return vs 99.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for KNCT.
KNCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.55% for STHH.
STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return, while KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 0.40% for KNCT.
KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 4.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STHH and KNCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer