STHH vs. IBTF

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STHH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return, while IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, STHH returned 179.38% vs 1.92% for IBTF. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.

Performance

STHH vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

STHH

• 1D: 6.57%
• 1M: 20.78%
• YTD: 207.66%
• 6M: 207.78%
• 1Y: 179.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBTF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 1.92%
• 3Y*: 3.77%
• 5Y*: 0.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STHH vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	207.66%	17.60%
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	2.60%

Correlation

The correlation between STHH and IBTF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

STHH vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 85
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 87
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 67

IBTF

IBTF Risk / Return Rank: 99
IBTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STHH vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STHH	IBTF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.38	6.75	-3.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	19.44	-15.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	6.26	-4.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.19	53.32	-48.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.77	269.65	-257.88

STHH vs. IBTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STHH Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is lower than the IBTF Sharpe Ratio of 6.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STHH and IBTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STHH vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than IBTF's maximum drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and IBTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	STHH	IBTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-10.45%	-23.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.89%	-0.04%	-33.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	0.00%	-0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-3.30%	-6.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.92%	0.01%	+14.91%

Volatility

STHH vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison

STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a higher volatility of 24.09% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) at 0.00%. This indicates that STHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STHH	IBTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.09%	0.00%	+24.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.12%	0.15%	+39.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.99%	0.35%	+51.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.04%	2.37%	+48.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.04%	2.55%	+48.49%

STHH vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

STHH vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison

STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than IBTF's 2.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF	2.08%	3.83%	4.32%	4.03%	1.93%	0.57%	0.59%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.66%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STHH and IBTF in my portfolio?

STHH and IBTF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STHH or IBTF?

STHH has higher volatility (24.09%) compared to IBTF (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STHH dropped -33.89% vs IBTF's -10.45%.

Which ETF is better, STHH or IBTF?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 179.38% vs 1.92% for IBTF. On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTF has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STHH or IBTF?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 179.38% return vs 1.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STHH or IBTF?

IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for STHH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STHH or IBTF?

IBTF has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.66% for STHH.

What is the main difference between STHH and IBTF?

STHH is categorized as Technology Equities, while IBTF is Government Bonds. STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return, while IBTF tracks ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 0.07% for IBTF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.75 vs 3.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.