STHH vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STHH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, STHH returned 209.77% vs 4.54% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

STHH vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STHH achieves a 209.56% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.

STHH

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 45.30%
• YTD: 209.56%
• 6M: 210.55%
• 1Y: 209.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STHH vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	209.56%	16.74%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.37%	2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between STHH and IBIC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

STHH vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 89
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 75

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STHH vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STHH	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.20	5.05	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.20	9.12	-4.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	2.24	-0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.23	17.27	-11.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.15	67.45	-53.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STHH vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STHH Sharpe Ratio is 4.20, which is comparable to the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STHH and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STHH	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.20	5.05	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.44	3.49	+0.95

Drawdowns

STHH vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	STHH	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-0.90%	-32.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.89%	-0.26%	-33.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.13%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-0.10%	-10.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.90%	0.07%	+14.83%

Volatility

STHH vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a higher volatility of 20.33% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that STHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STHH	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.33%	0.33%	+20.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.77%	0.67%	+36.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.39%	0.90%	+49.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.44%	1.58%	+47.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.44%	1.58%	+47.86%

STHH vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

STHH vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.55%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STHH and IBIC in my portfolio?

STHH and IBIC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STHH or IBIC?

STHH has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STHH dropped -33.89% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, STHH or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 209.77% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STHH or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 209.77% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STHH or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for STHH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STHH or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.55% for STHH.

What is the main difference between STHH and IBIC?

STHH is categorized as Technology Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 4.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.