PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STFBX vs. SIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STFBX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Farm Balanced Fund (STFBX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STFBX achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly higher than SIFAX's 8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, STFBX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 10.35%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.55% annualized return.


STFBX

1D
0.40%
1M
2.79%
YTD
9.09%
6M
8.72%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
10.35%

SIFAX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
8.08%
6M
7.70%
1Y
12.43%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
3.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STFBX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STFBX
State Farm Balanced Fund
9.09%15.62%14.84%13.61%-10.23%17.54%13.67%21.42%-3.54%11.41%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
8.08%7.82%4.08%-1.74%8.48%10.83%-1.59%5.68%-3.64%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between STFBX and SIFAX is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.33

The correlation between STFBX and SIFAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STFBX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STFBX
STFBX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
STFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
STFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
STFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
STFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SIFAX
SIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STFBX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Farm Balanced Fund (STFBX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STFBXSIFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.44

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

5.18

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.30

16.54

+0.76

STFBX vs. SIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STFBX Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the SIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STFBX and SIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STFBXSIFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

2.31

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

1.05

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.68

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.34

+0.46

Drawdowns

STFBX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STFBX drawdown since its inception was -31.11%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STFBX and SIFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STFBXSIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.11%

-23.62%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-2.41%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.70%

-3.57%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.94%

-8.32%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.74%

-14.69%

-8.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-1.83%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-8.55%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

0.75%

+0.74%

Volatility

STFBX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison

State Farm Balanced Fund (STFBX) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) at 2.18%. This indicates that STFBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STFBXSIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.18%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

4.69%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.47%

5.41%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.43%

5.60%

+5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.50%

5.22%

+6.28%

STFBX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STFBX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

STFBX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison

STFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than SIFAX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
4.21%4.55%3.25%3.82%11.90%7.89%1.45%1.49%1.90%1.39%1.15%0.48%
STFBX
State Farm Balanced Fund
6.58%7.17%9.73%7.13%1.08%9.49%2.75%2.70%3.45%2.86%2.88%10.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


STFBX and SIFAX have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STFBX has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to SIFAX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STFBX dropped -31.11% vs SIFAX's -23.62%.

STFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STFBX and SIFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer