PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STFBX vs. FBALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STFBX vs. FBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Farm Balanced Fund (STFBX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STFBX achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly lower than FBALX's 10.21% return. Over the past 10 years, STFBX has underperformed FBALX with an annualized return of 10.27%, while FBALX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.


STFBX

1D
0.58%
1M
0.17%
YTD
8.41%
6M
8.37%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
10.27%

FBALX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.41%
YTD
10.21%
6M
10.14%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STFBX vs. FBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STFBX
State Farm Balanced Fund
8.41%15.62%14.84%13.61%-10.23%17.54%13.67%21.42%-3.54%11.41%
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
10.21%15.11%16.09%20.31%-18.29%18.27%22.45%24.40%-3.98%16.52%

Correlation

The correlation between STFBX and FBALX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1986

0.86

The correlation between STFBX and FBALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STFBX vs. FBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STFBX
STFBX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
STFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
STFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
STFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
STFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FBALX
FBALX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STFBX vs. FBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Farm Balanced Fund (STFBX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STFBXFBALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.50

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

3.71

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.99

17.34

-1.36

STFBX vs. FBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STFBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the FBALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STFBX and FBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STFBX vs. FBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STFBX drawdown since its inception was -31.11%, smaller than the maximum FBALX drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STFBX and FBALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STFBXFBALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.11%

-43.57%

+12.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-6.47%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.70%

-12.88%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.94%

-22.89%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.74%

-26.68%

+3.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-0.14%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-4.37%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.38%

+0.14%

Volatility

STFBX vs. FBALX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Farm Balanced Fund (STFBX) is 2.84%, while Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that STFBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STFBXFBALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

3.74%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

7.52%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.74%

9.16%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.47%

12.26%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.52%

12.82%

-1.30%

STFBX vs. FBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STFBX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FBALX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

STFBX vs. FBALX - Dividend Comparison

STFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than FBALX's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
5.14%5.69%5.67%2.28%8.06%9.66%5.90%4.24%10.99%7.90%3.07%7.70%
STFBX
State Farm Balanced Fund
6.68%7.17%9.73%7.13%1.08%9.49%2.75%2.70%3.45%2.86%2.88%10.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


STFBX and FBALX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBALX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to STFBX (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STFBX dropped -31.11% vs FBALX's -43.57%.

STFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STFBX and FBALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer