PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STFBX vs. SFBDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STFBX vs. SFBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Farm Balanced Fund (STFBX) and State Farm Municipal Bond Fund (SFBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STFBX achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly higher than SFBDX's -0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, STFBX has outperformed SFBDX with an annualized return of 10.04%, while SFBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.


STFBX

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.43%
6M
6.12%
YTD
8.99%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
14.38%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
10.04%
ALL TIME*
8.60%

SFBDX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-1.83%
6M
-1.41%
YTD
-0.53%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
2.39%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
1.68%
ALL TIME*
3.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

STFBX vs. SFBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STFBX
State Farm Balanced Fund
8.99%15.62%14.84%13.61%-10.23%17.54%13.67%21.42%-3.54%11.41%
SFBDX
State Farm Municipal Bond Fund
-0.53%5.11%0.65%4.05%-6.83%0.65%7.01%6.23%0.62%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between STFBX and SFBDX is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1990

0.05

The correlation between STFBX and SFBDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STFBX vs. SFBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STFBX
STFBX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
STFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
STFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
STFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
STFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SFBDX
SFBDX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SFBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SFBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STFBX vs. SFBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Farm Balanced Fund (STFBX) and State Farm Municipal Bond Fund (SFBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STFBXSFBDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

1.38

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

4.05

+8.19

STFBX vs. SFBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STFBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the SFBDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STFBX and SFBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STFBX vs. SFBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STFBX drawdown since its inception was -31.11%, which is greater than SFBDX's maximum drawdown of -11.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STFBX and SFBDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STFBXSFBDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.11%

-11.79%

-19.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-2.87%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.70%

-4.33%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.94%

-11.79%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.74%

-11.79%

-10.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-2.37%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-1.37%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

0.97%

+0.57%

Volatility

STFBX vs. SFBDX - Volatility Comparison

State Farm Balanced Fund (STFBX) has a higher volatility of 2.07% compared to State Farm Municipal Bond Fund (SFBDX) at 0.84%. This indicates that STFBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STFBXSFBDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

0.84%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

2.00%

+4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

2.41%

+6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.46%

3.29%

+8.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.51%

3.41%

+8.10%

STFBX vs. SFBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STFBX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SFBDX's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

STFBX vs. SFBDX - Dividend Comparison

STFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than SFBDX's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFBDX
State Farm Municipal Bond Fund
3.12%2.97%2.62%2.46%2.01%2.33%4.03%2.78%2.23%2.77%2.06%2.64%
STFBX
State Farm Balanced Fund
6.64%7.17%9.73%7.13%1.08%9.49%2.75%2.70%3.45%2.86%2.88%10.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


STFBX and SFBDX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STFBX has higher volatility (2.07%) compared to SFBDX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STFBX dropped -31.11% vs SFBDX's -11.79%.

STFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STFBX and SFBDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer