STFBX vs. SFBDX
Compare and contrast key facts about State Farm Balanced Fund (STFBX) and State Farm Municipal Bond Fund (SFBDX).
STFBX is managed by State Farm. It was launched on Mar 13, 1968. SFBDX is managed by State Farm. It was launched on Oct 31, 1977.
Performance
STFBX vs. SFBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STFBX vs. SFBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STFBX State Farm Balanced Fund | 0.05% | 15.62% | 14.84% | 13.61% | -10.23% | 17.54% | 13.67% | 21.42% | -3.54% | 11.41% |
SFBDX State Farm Municipal Bond Fund | -0.68% | 5.11% | 0.65% | 4.05% | -6.83% | 0.65% | 7.01% | 6.23% | 0.62% | 3.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STFBX achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than SFBDX's -0.68% return. Over the past 10 years, STFBX has outperformed SFBDX with an annualized return of 9.63%, while SFBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.76% annualized return.
STFBX
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 3.51%
- 1Y
- 18.10%
- 3Y*
- 13.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
SFBDX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.65%
- 10Y*
- 1.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STFBX vs. SFBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STFBX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SFBDX's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
STFBX vs. SFBDX — Risk / Return Rank
STFBX
SFBDX
STFBX vs. SFBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Farm Balanced Fund (STFBX) and State Farm Municipal Bond Fund (SFBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STFBX | SFBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 1.24 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.15 | 1.64 | +0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.37 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | 5.38 | +3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STFBX | SFBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.24 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.20 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.52 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 1.17 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between STFBX and SFBDX is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
STFBX vs. SFBDX - Dividend Comparison
STFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than SFBDX's 3.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STFBX State Farm Balanced Fund | 7.17% | 7.17% | 9.73% | 7.13% | 1.08% | 9.49% | 2.75% | 2.70% | 3.45% | 2.86% | 2.88% | 10.94% |
SFBDX State Farm Municipal Bond Fund | 3.03% | 2.97% | 2.62% | 2.46% | 2.01% | 2.33% | 4.03% | 2.78% | 2.23% | 2.77% | 2.06% | 2.64% |
Drawdowns
STFBX vs. SFBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STFBX drawdown since its inception was -31.11%, which is greater than SFBDX's maximum drawdown of -11.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STFBX and SFBDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STFBX | SFBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.11% | -11.79% | -19.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -3.58% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.94% | -11.79% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.74% | -11.79% | -10.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -2.51% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -1.37% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 0.91% | +1.10% |
Volatility
STFBX vs. SFBDX - Volatility Comparison
State Farm Balanced Fund (STFBX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to State Farm Municipal Bond Fund (SFBDX) at 1.01%. This indicates that STFBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STFBX | SFBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 1.01% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.55% | 1.55% | +5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 3.70% | +8.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 3.23% | +8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.46% | 3.39% | +8.07% |