PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STBQ vs. QSOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STBQ vs. QSOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF (STBQ) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STBQ achieves a -19.28% return, which is significantly higher than QSOL's -39.97% return.


STBQ

1D
-1.26%
1M
-6.80%
YTD
-19.28%
6M
-19.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QSOL

1D
-3.25%
1M
-9.93%
YTD
-39.97%
6M
-39.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STBQ vs. QSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
STBQ
Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF
-19.28%-1.97%
QSOL
Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF
-39.97%-0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between STBQ and QSOL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STBQ vs. QSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF (STBQ) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

STBQ vs. QSOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STBQ vs. QSOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STBQ drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum QSOL drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STBQ and QSOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STBQQSOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.10%

-56.55%

+23.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.68%

-49.53%

+22.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.05%

-34.56%

+15.51%

Volatility

STBQ vs. QSOL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STBQQSOLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.26%

73.11%

-29.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.26%

73.11%

-29.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.26%

73.11%

-29.85%

Dividends

STBQ vs. QSOL - Dividend Comparison

STBQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STBQ and QSOL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for STBQ.

STBQ is categorized as Blockchain, while QSOL is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STBQ and QSOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer