STBQ vs. CIFU

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

STBQ (Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STBQ is a Blockchain fund managed by Amplify, while CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

STBQ vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF (STBQ) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STBQ achieves a -19.28% return, which is significantly lower than CIFU's 51.34% return.

STBQ

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -6.80%
• YTD: -19.28%
• 6M: -19.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: -2.94%
• YTD: 51.34%
• 6M: 54.43%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STBQ vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STBQ Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF	-19.28%	-1.97%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	51.34%	-20.37%

Correlation

The correlation between STBQ and CIFU is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

STBQ vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF (STBQ) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

STBQ vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STBQ drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum CIFU drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STBQ and CIFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	STBQ	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.10%	-77.20%	+44.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.68%	-30.31%	+3.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.05%	-42.32%	+23.27%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	STBQ	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.26%	204.66%	-161.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.26%	204.66%	-161.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.26%	204.66%	-161.40%

Dividends

STBQ vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

Neither STBQ nor CIFU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STBQ and CIFU in my portfolio?

STBQ and CIFU have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STBQ or CIFU?

STBQ and CIFU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between STBQ and CIFU?

STBQ is categorized as Blockchain, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and REX.