PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STAG vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STAG vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STAG achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 11.53% return.


STAG

1D
0.67%
1M
2.46%
6M
6.68%
YTD
9.26%
1Y
13.53%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
9.77%

QQQI

1D
1.03%
1M
0.87%
6M
9.92%
YTD
11.53%
1Y
22.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STAG vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
9.26%13.30%-7.78%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
11.53%18.62%19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between STAG and QQQI is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024

0.20

The correlation between STAG and QQQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STAG vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STAG
STAG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
STAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
STAG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
STAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
STAG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STAG vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STAGQQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.28

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

2.40

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.57

9.90

-6.33

STAG vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STAG and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STAG vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STAG drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STAG and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STAGQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.08%

-20.00%

-25.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-9.61%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.84%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-2.21%

-8.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

2.32%

+1.48%

Volatility

STAG vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) is 5.90%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that STAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STAGQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.90%

6.94%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

12.78%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.70%

15.44%

+4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

17.60%

+5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.15%

17.60%

+8.55%

Dividends

STAG vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

STAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than QQQI's 13.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.62%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
3.86%4.05%4.38%3.74%4.52%3.02%4.60%4.53%5.71%5.14%5.82%7.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


STAG and QQQI have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQI has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to STAG (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STAG dropped -45.08% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STAG and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer