PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSS vs. ZCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSS vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SSS

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.20%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZCSH

1D
-0.70%
1M
27.73%
6M
34.77%
YTD
21.31%
1Y
882.99%
3Y*
156.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSS vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SSS and ZCSH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSS vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSS vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSSZCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.39

SSS vs. ZCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSS vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSS drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSS and ZCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSSZCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-93.73%

+79.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.66%

-27.64%

+22.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-73.50%

+66.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.07%

Volatility

SSS vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSSZCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

106.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.37%

174.73%

-151.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.37%

137.92%

-114.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.37%

137.92%

-114.55%

SSS vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSS vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison

SSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SSS and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SSS is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSS is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

SSS has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.

SSS tracks S&P 500 and S&P Solana 75/25 Blend Index, while ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC). They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSS and 2.50% for ZCSH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSS and ZCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer