SSS vs. AOA
SSS (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF) and AOA (iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSS is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the S&P 500 and S&P Solana 75/25 Blend Index, while AOA is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SSS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AOA.
Performance
SSS vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SSS
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AOA
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 11.66%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.58M | $10.35M | $10.48M | |
| $18.61K | $12.62K | $40.74K |
SSS vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF | -1.62% |
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSS and AOA is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSS vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank
SSS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AOA
SSS vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSS | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSS vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSS drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSS and AOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSS | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.64% | -28.38% | +13.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | 0.00% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.37% | -4.03% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.94% | — |
Volatility
SSS vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSS | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.89% | 11.54% | +11.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 13.12% | +9.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 13.52% | +9.37% |
SSS vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSS vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
SSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than AOA's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSS and AOA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AOA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AOA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSS.
AOA has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.09% for SSS.
SSS is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while AOA is Diversified Portfolio. SSS tracks S&P 500 and S&P Solana 75/25 Blend Index, while AOA tracks S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSS and 0.15% for AOA.
Find the right allocation for SSS and AOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer