SSS vs. TUG

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

SSS (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF) and TUG (STF Tactical Growth ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. SSS is passively managed, while TUG is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for TUG.

Performance

SSS vs. TUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SSS

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.31%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TUG

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -2.14%
• 6M: 16.37%
• YTD: 17.27%
• 1Y: 29.53%
• 3Y*: 21.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSS vs. TUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF	-2.33%
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF	14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SSS and TUG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026	0.72

Return for Risk

SSS vs. TUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TUG

TUG Risk / Return Rank: 58
TUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
TUG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
TUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
TUG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSS vs. TUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSS	TUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.63	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.19	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.41	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.57	—

Drawdowns

SSS vs. TUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSS drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum TUG drawdown of -22.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSS and TUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSS	TUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.64%	-22.27%	+7.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.13%	-3.04%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.59%	-4.29%	-2.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SSS	TUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.52%	18.25%	+5.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.52%	18.36%	+5.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.52%	18.36%	+5.16%

SSS vs. TUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TUG's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSS vs. TUG - Dividend Comparison

SSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than TUG's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF	1.44%	1.75%	4.97%	1.34%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSS and TUG in my portfolio?

SSS and TUG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SSS or TUG?

On fees, TUG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSS or TUG?

TUG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSS or TUG?

TUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.09% for SSS.

What is the main difference between SSS and TUG?

They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and STF. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSS and 0.65% for TUG.