SSS vs. EZET

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

SSS (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - SSS tracks the S&P 500 and S&P Solana 75/25 Blend Index while EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SSS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.

Performance

SSS vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SSS

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: 0.48%
• 6M: 2.77%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

EZET

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 10.09%
• 6M: -18.59%
• YTD: -36.99%
• 1Y: -49.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	$400.33K	$484.91K	$668.91K
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF	$18.61K	$12.62K	$40.74K

SSS vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF	-1.62%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-33.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SSS and EZET is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026	0.85

Return for Risk

SSS vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 3
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSS vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSS	EZET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.74	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.95	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.89	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.72	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.07	—

Drawdowns

SSS vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSS drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSS and EZET.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSS	EZET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.64%	-67.89%	+53.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-67.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-61.38%	+58.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.37%	-35.30%	+28.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	45.69%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SSS	EZET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	43.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.89%	66.94%	-44.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.89%	71.19%	-48.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.89%	71.19%	-48.30%

SSS vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSS vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

SSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSS and EZET in my portfolio?

SSS and EZET have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SSS or EZET?

On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSS or EZET?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSS or EZET?

SSS has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

What is the main difference between SSS and EZET?

SSS tracks S&P 500 and S&P Solana 75/25 Blend Index, while EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSS and 0.19% for EZET.