SSRM vs. EMEQ
SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.) is a stock, while EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura. Over the past year, SSRM returned 139.32% vs 154.82% for EMEQ. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SSRM vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSRM achieves a 34.40% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 74.89% return.
SSRM
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 34.40%
- 6M
- 38.77%
- 1Y
- 139.32%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
EMEQ
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 16.61%
- YTD
- 74.89%
- 6M
- 86.91%
- 1Y
- 154.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSRM vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 34.40% | 214.94% | 38.37% |
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 74.89% | 69.78% | -1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSRM and EMEQ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSRM vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank
SSRM
EMEQ
SSRM vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSRM | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.71 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.54 | 8.70 | -4.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.31 | 34.77 | -22.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSRM | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 4.85 | -2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 2.87 | -2.76 |
Drawdowns
SSRM vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSRM drawdown since its inception was -91.68%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSRM and EMEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSRM | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.68% | -19.99% | -71.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.88% | -17.91% | -12.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.32% | -3.05% | -29.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.17% | -3.97% | -53.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.36% | 4.47% | +6.89% |
Volatility
SSRM vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison
SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) has a higher volatility of 21.51% compared to Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) at 15.07%. This indicates that SSRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSRM | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.51% | 15.07% | +6.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.56% | 28.60% | +23.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.44% | 32.17% | +33.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.67% | 29.97% | +25.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.84% | 29.97% | +22.87% |
Dividends
SSRM vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison
SSRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.58% | 2.76% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSRM and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSRM has higher volatility (21.51%) compared to EMEQ (15.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSRM dropped -91.68% vs EMEQ's -19.99%.
EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.85 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSRM and EMEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer