SSO vs. VGT
SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSO returned 23.84%/yr vs 25.13%/yr for VGT. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
SSO vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SSO has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 23.84%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.13% annualized return.
SSO
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 43.37%
- 3Y*
- 34.28%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 23.84%
VGT
- 1D
- 3.32%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 19.85%
- 1Y
- 48.19%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 20.21%
- 10Y*
- 25.13%
SSO vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 13.90% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 23.32% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSO and VGT is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SSO and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSO vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSO
VGT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SSO
VGT
Financial Services
SSO
VGT
Communication Services
SSO
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
SSO
VGT
Healthcare
SSO
VGT
Industrials
SSO
VGT
Consumer Defensive
SSO
VGT
-
Energy
SSO
VGT
Utilities
SSO
VGT
-
Real Estate
SSO
VGT
-
Basic Materials
SSO
VGT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSO vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
SSO
VGT
SSO vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.37 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 2.95 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.28 | 9.18 | +1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSO vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.67% | -54.63% | -30.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | -16.40% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -27.23% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.73% | -35.07% | -11.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.34% | -35.07% | -24.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -7.71% | +1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.55% | -7.95% | -11.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 5.27% | -1.04% |
Volatility
SSO vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is 8.75%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that SSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | 10.03% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.19% | 18.00% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.53% | 22.01% | +2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.79% | 25.41% | +8.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.95% | 24.72% | +11.23% |
SSO vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSO vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSO and VGT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to SSO (8.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSO dropped -84.67% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.13% vs 23.84% for SSO. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 8.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.13% return vs 23.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
SSO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. SSO tracks S&P 500, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSO and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer