SSO vs. SQQQ
SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SSO tracks the S&P 500 while SQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSO returned 23.27%/yr vs -55.28%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.90, they often move in opposite directions. SSO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
SSO vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 17.32% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -40.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SSO has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 23.27%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.28% annualized return.
SSO
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 1Y
- 37.37%
- 3Y*
- 32.47%
- 5Y*
- 17.61%
- 10Y*
- 23.27%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 5.74%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- 6M
- -36.57%
- YTD
- -40.27%
- 1Y
- -56.10%
- 3Y*
- -51.78%
- 5Y*
- -45.66%
- 10Y*
- -55.28%
SSO vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 17.32% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -40.27% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSO and SQQQ is -0.93, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.90 |
The correlation between SSO and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSO vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSO
SQQQ
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SSO
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
SSO
SQQQ
Communication Services
SSO
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SSO
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
SSO
SQQQ
-
Industrials
SSO
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
SSO
SQQQ
-
Utilities
SSO
SQQQ
-
Energy
SSO
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
SSO
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
SSO
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSO vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SSO
SQQQ
SSO vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSO | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.82 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | -0.92 | +2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.51 | -1.71 | +10.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSO vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSO | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.67% | -100.00% | +15.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | -61.03% | +42.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -92.51% | +57.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.73% | -97.27% | +50.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.34% | -99.97% | +40.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.10% | -100.00% | +96.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.49% | -92.75% | +73.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 32.78% | -28.38% |
Volatility
SSO vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is 8.22%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.05%. This indicates that SSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSO | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 26.05% | -17.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.91% | 45.88% | -25.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.05% | 55.64% | -30.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.87% | 67.87% | -34.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.88% | 66.56% | -30.68% |
SSO vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSO vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than SQQQ's 10.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 10.00% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSO and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.05%) compared to SSO (8.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSO dropped -84.67% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 23.27% vs -55.28% for SQQQ. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 8.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 23.27% return vs -55.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.00%, compared with 0.67% for SSO.
SSO tracks S&P 500, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 0.95% for SQQQ.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSO and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer