SSO vs. SQQQ
SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SSO tracks the S&P 500 while SQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSO returned 23.19%/yr vs -54.48%/yr for SQQQ. Their -0.90 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SSO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
SSO vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -34.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SSO has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 23.19%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -54.48% annualized return.
SSO
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 37.35%
- 3Y*
- 30.77%
- 5Y*
- 17.16%
- 10Y*
- 23.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.64%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 9.46%
- 6M
- -32.40%
- YTD
- -34.61%
- 1Y
- -52.32%
- 3Y*
- -49.83%
- 5Y*
- -44.46%
- 10Y*
- -54.48%
- ALL TIME*
- -52.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.40B | $2.29B | $2.66B | |
| $177.82M | $191.16M | $223.05M |
SSO vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 16.14% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -34.61% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSO and SQQQ is -0.93, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.90 |
The correlation between SSO and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSO vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSO
SQQQ
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SSO
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
SSO
SQQQ
Communication Services
SSO
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
SSO
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SSO
SQQQ
-
Industrials
SSO
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
SSO
SQQQ
-
Energy
SSO
SQQQ
-
Utilities
SSO
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
SSO
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
SSO
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSO vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SSO
SQQQ
SSO vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSO | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.86 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | -0.81 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | -1.41 | +8.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSO vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSO | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.67% | -100.00% | +15.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | -61.03% | +42.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -92.51% | +57.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.73% | -97.27% | +50.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.34% | -99.97% | +40.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.07% | -100.00% | +95.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.45% | -92.78% | +73.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 35.08% | -30.54% |
Volatility
SSO vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is 7.07%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 20.82%. This indicates that SSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSO | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 20.82% | -13.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.14% | 48.09% | -27.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.63% | 57.98% | -32.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 68.18% | -34.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.91% | 66.74% | -30.83% |
SSO vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSO vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than SQQQ's 9.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.14% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSO and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (20.82%) compared to SSO (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSO dropped -84.67% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 23.19% vs -54.48% for SQQQ. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 23.19% return vs -54.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.14%, compared with 0.67% for SSO.
SSO tracks S&P 500, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 0.95% for SQQQ.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSO and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer