SSO vs. PAVE
SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSO returned 18.57%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for PAVE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
SSO vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 20.86% return.
SSO
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 15.08%
- 6M
- 15.47%
- 1Y
- 47.12%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 18.57%
- 10Y*
- 24.02%
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 38.94%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
SSO vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 15.08% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 28.88% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.86% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSO and PAVE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SSO and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SSO vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSO
PAVE
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SSO
PAVE
Financial Services
SSO
PAVE
-
Communication Services
SSO
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
SSO
PAVE
-
Healthcare
SSO
PAVE
-
Industrials
SSO
PAVE
Consumer Defensive
SSO
PAVE
Energy
SSO
PAVE
Utilities
SSO
PAVE
Real Estate
SSO
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
SSO
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSO vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
SSO
PAVE
SSO vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 3.11 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 11.32 | -0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSO vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.67% | -44.08% | -40.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | -11.91% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -26.23% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.73% | -26.23% | -20.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -1.01% | -3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.55% | -6.23% | -13.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 3.27% | +0.97% |
Volatility
SSO vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 7.35%. This indicates that SSO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 7.35% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.17% | 15.87% | +3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.54% | 19.49% | +5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 21.70% | +12.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.95% | 24.40% | +11.55% |
SSO vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSO vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than PAVE's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.64% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSO and PAVE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSO has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to PAVE (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSO dropped -84.67% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, SSO leads with 18.57% vs 17.84% for PAVE. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SSO has performed better with a 18.57% return vs 17.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.64% for SSO.
SSO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. SSO tracks S&P 500, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSO and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer