SSO vs. METU

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SSO is passively managed, while METU is actively managed. Over the past year, SSO returned 33.08% vs -34.85% for METU. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSO charges 0.87%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for METU.

Performance

SSO vs. METU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly higher than METU's -17.90% return.

SSO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -1.70%
• 6M: 12.09%
• YTD: 14.99%
• 1Y: 33.08%
• 3Y*: 31.07%
• 5Y*: 17.34%
• 10Y*: 22.87%
• ALL TIME*: 15.61%

METU

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 21.57%
• 6M: -6.45%
• YTD: -17.90%
• 1Y: -34.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSO vs. METU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500	14.99%	26.19%	19.51%
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	-17.90%	-1.01%	28.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SSO and METU is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024	0.57

The correlation between SSO and METU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

SSO vs. METU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SSO	METU
Technology	26.0%	-
Financial Services	24.2%	-
Communication Services	7.0%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	-
Healthcare	6.0%	-
Industrials	5.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	-
Energy	2.1%	-
Utilities	1.5%	-
Real Estate	1.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

SSO vs. METU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSO

SSO Risk / Return Rank: 51
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

METU

METU Risk / Return Rank: 6
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 7
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSO vs. METU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSO	METU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	-0.45	+1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	-0.25	+2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.97	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	-0.57	+2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.49	-0.92	+8.40

SSO vs. METU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSO Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the METU Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSO and METU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SSO vs. METU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, which is greater than METU's maximum drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and METU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSO	METU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.67%	-61.86%	-22.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.17%	-61.54%	+43.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.02%	-47.52%	+42.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.47%	-25.25%	+5.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.43%	38.08%	-33.65%

Volatility

SSO vs. METU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is 6.60%, while Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a volatility of 29.45%. This indicates that SSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSO	METU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.60%	29.45%	-22.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.01%	62.20%	-42.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.15%	77.46%	-52.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.83%	74.36%	-40.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.88%	74.36%	-38.48%

SSO vs. METU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than METU's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSO vs. METU - Dividend Comparison

SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than METU's 3.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	3.38%	3.00%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500	0.68%	0.68%	0.85%	0.18%	0.50%	0.18%	0.20%	0.50%	0.75%	0.39%	0.51%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSO and METU in my portfolio?

SSO and METU have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSO or METU?

METU has higher volatility (29.45%) compared to SSO (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSO dropped -84.67% vs METU's -61.86%.

Which ETF is better, SSO or METU?

On 1-year performance, SSO leads with 33.08% vs -34.85% for METU. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 6.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SSO or METU?

Over the 1-year period, SSO has performed better with a 33.08% return vs -34.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSO or METU?

SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for METU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSO or METU?

METU has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.68% for SSO.

What is the main difference between SSO and METU?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 1.07% for METU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.