SSMG vs. PFFA
SSMG (Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF) and PFFA (Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while PFFA is a Preferred Stock fund actively managed by Virtus. Both are actively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SSMG charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for PFFA.
Performance
SSMG vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SSMG
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PFFA
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 6.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.28M | $16.87M | $20.10M | |
| $5.89K | $3.26K | $5.76K |
SSMG vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF | 7.79% |
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSMG and PFFA is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSMG vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank
SSMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PFFA
SSMG vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSMG | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSMG vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSMG drawdown since its inception was -13.72%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMG and PFFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSMG | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -70.52% | +56.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -1.93% | -2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -6.57% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility
SSMG vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSMG | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.58% | 7.64% | +20.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 11.61% | +16.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 31.54% | -2.96% |
SSMG vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSMG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSMG vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison
SSMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PFFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 9.84% | 9.47% | 9.18% | 9.56% | 10.75% | 7.64% | 8.54% | 10.02% | 5.15% |
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSMG and PFFA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSMG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSMG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.
PFFA has the higher dividend yield at 9.84%, compared with 0.00% for SSMG.
SSMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PFFA is Preferred Stock. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SSMG and 1.47% for PFFA.
Find the right allocation for SSMG and PFFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer