PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSMAX vs. CAVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSMAX vs. CAVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (SSMAX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSMAX achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly higher than CAVAX's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SSMAX has underperformed CAVAX with an annualized return of 9.04%, while CAVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.10% annualized return.


SSMAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.66%
YTD
10.90%
6M
11.36%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
9.04%

CAVAX

1D
0.49%
1M
3.35%
YTD
9.32%
6M
10.43%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
12.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSMAX vs. CAVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSMAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund
10.90%3.70%11.72%12.41%-17.84%25.88%12.25%25.52%-11.36%13.53%
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
9.32%15.45%16.72%21.33%-18.51%20.57%17.33%26.63%-10.24%23.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SSMAX and CAVAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.92

The correlation between SSMAX and CAVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSMAX vs. CAVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSMAX
SSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CAVAX
CAVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CAVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CAVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSMAX vs. CAVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (SSMAX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSMAXCAVAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

1.96

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

2.75

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.69

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.53

11.48

-3.95

SSMAX vs. CAVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the CAVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSMAX and CAVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSMAXCAVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.96

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.56

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.70

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.69

-0.35

Drawdowns

SSMAX vs. CAVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMAX drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than CAVAX's maximum drawdown of -36.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMAX and CAVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSMAXCAVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.31%

-36.55%

-21.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-8.49%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.61%

-17.95%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.45%

-26.51%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.23%

-36.55%

-4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

0.00%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-5.06%

-4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.99%

+0.63%

Volatility

SSMAX vs. CAVAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (SSMAX) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX) at 2.90%. This indicates that SSMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSMAXCAVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

2.90%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

8.90%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

11.82%

+3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.20%

16.08%

+3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

17.39%

+3.36%

SSMAX vs. CAVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than CAVAX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSMAX vs. CAVAX - Dividend Comparison

SSMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than CAVAX's 6.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
6.16%6.73%7.01%1.29%3.67%16.58%2.98%2.80%5.66%0.71%0.99%0.00%
SSMAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund
6.97%7.73%7.95%1.02%7.76%29.28%3.90%6.69%25.14%12.23%4.94%17.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSMAX and CAVAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSMAX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to CAVAX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSMAX dropped -58.31% vs CAVAX's -36.55%.

CAVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSMAX and CAVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer