PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSMAX vs. WWSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSMAX vs. WWSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (SSMAX) and Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional (WWSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSMAX achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly lower than WWSIX's 26.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SSMAX has underperformed WWSIX with an annualized return of 9.15%, while WWSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.69% annualized return.


SSMAX

1D
1.02%
1M
2.46%
YTD
12.03%
6M
11.32%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
12.42%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
9.15%

WWSIX

1D
1.16%
1M
4.17%
YTD
26.69%
6M
27.09%
1Y
60.23%
3Y*
24.00%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
14.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSMAX vs. WWSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSMAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund
12.03%3.70%11.72%12.41%-17.84%25.88%12.25%25.52%-11.36%13.53%
WWSIX
Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional
26.69%17.55%15.79%12.87%-12.30%30.04%11.27%28.74%-13.49%16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SSMAX and WWSIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2008

0.96

The correlation between SSMAX and WWSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSMAX vs. WWSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSMAX
SSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

WWSIX
WWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
WWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
WWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSMAX vs. WWSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (SSMAX) and Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional (WWSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSMAXWWSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

3.10

-1.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

4.05

-1.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.53

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

6.30

-3.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.11

22.98

-14.87

SSMAX vs. WWSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the WWSIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSMAX and WWSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSMAXWWSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

3.10

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.55

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.62

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.44

-0.09

Drawdowns

SSMAX vs. WWSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMAX drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, roughly equal to the maximum WWSIX drawdown of -59.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMAX and WWSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSMAXWWSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.31%

-59.71%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-10.17%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.61%

-26.17%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.45%

-26.17%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.23%

-45.11%

+3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.34%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-8.96%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.78%

-0.16%

Volatility

SSMAX vs. WWSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (SSMAX) is 4.23%, while Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional (WWSIX) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that SSMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSMAXWWSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

5.21%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

13.81%

-2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

20.70%

-5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

21.65%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

23.72%

-2.96%

SSMAX vs. WWSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than WWSIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSMAX vs. WWSIX - Dividend Comparison

SSMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, more than WWSIX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSMAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund
6.89%7.73%7.95%1.02%7.76%29.28%3.90%6.69%25.14%12.23%4.94%17.42%
WWSIX
Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional
6.09%7.72%28.12%3.00%1.85%5.58%0.20%4.70%14.34%8.83%9.05%18.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SSMAX and WWSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WWSIX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to SSMAX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSMAX dropped -58.31% vs WWSIX's -59.71%.

WWSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSMAX and WWSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer