PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAVAX vs. SMQFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAVAX vs. SMQFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAVAX achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than SMQFX's 18.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CAVAX has outperformed SMQFX with an annualized return of 11.97%, while SMQFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return.


CAVAX

1D
0.21%
1M
2.30%
6M
7.28%
YTD
10.38%
1Y
20.16%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
11.97%
ALL TIME*
11.84%

SMQFX

1D
1.47%
1M
0.00%
6M
8.48%
YTD
18.65%
1Y
38.81%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
10.73%
ALL TIME*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CAVAX vs. SMQFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
10.38%15.45%16.72%21.33%-18.51%20.57%17.33%26.63%-10.24%23.69%
SMQFX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
18.65%40.14%9.19%16.67%-19.31%8.09%17.33%18.91%-17.67%33.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CAVAX and SMQFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.69

The correlation between CAVAX and SMQFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAVAX vs. SMQFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CAVAX
CAVAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CAVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CAVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SMQFX
SMQFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SMQFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMQFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMQFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SMQFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMQFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CAVAX vs. SMQFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAVAXSMQFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.76

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.10

9.00

+0.10

CAVAX vs. SMQFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the SMQFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAVAX and SMQFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAVAX vs. SMQFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAVAX drawdown since its inception was -36.55%, smaller than the maximum SMQFX drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAVAX and SMQFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAVAXSMQFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.55%

-40.14%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-13.62%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.95%

-15.03%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.51%

-36.37%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.55%

-40.14%

+3.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.44%

+6.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-11.96%

+6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

4.16%

-2.11%

Volatility

CAVAX vs. SMQFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX) is 3.49%, while SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that CAVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMQFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAVAXSMQFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

7.75%

-4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

18.14%

-8.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

20.09%

-7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

18.46%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

17.23%

+0.08%

CAVAX vs. SMQFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAVAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than SMQFX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAVAX vs. SMQFX - Dividend Comparison

CAVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, less than SMQFX's 25.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
6.10%6.73%7.01%1.29%3.67%16.58%2.98%2.80%5.66%0.71%0.99%0.00%
SMQFX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
25.48%30.23%6.43%3.24%5.32%17.70%1.80%1.89%11.55%2.70%2.15%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAVAX and SMQFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMQFX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to CAVAX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAVAX dropped -36.55% vs SMQFX's -40.14%.

SMQFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAVAX and SMQFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer