PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSMAX vs. LDRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSMAX vs. LDRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (SSMAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSMAX achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly higher than LDRAX's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SSMAX has outperformed LDRAX with an annualized return of 9.04%, while LDRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.43% annualized return.


SSMAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.66%
YTD
10.90%
6M
11.36%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
9.04%

LDRAX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.79%
YTD
0.43%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
7.06%
3Y*
2.45%
5Y*
-3.23%
10Y*
1.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSMAX vs. LDRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSMAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund
10.90%3.70%11.72%12.41%-17.84%25.88%12.25%25.52%-11.36%13.53%
LDRAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund
0.43%6.81%-3.28%7.16%-27.73%-2.19%18.23%21.19%-5.16%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SSMAX and LDRAX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

-0.20

The correlation between SSMAX and LDRAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSMAX vs. LDRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSMAX
SSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

LDRAX
LDRAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LDRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSMAX vs. LDRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (SSMAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSMAXLDRAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

0.79

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

1.17

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.14

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

1.31

+0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.53

3.30

+4.23

SSMAX vs. LDRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the LDRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSMAX and LDRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSMAXLDRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.79

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.26

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.13

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.13

+0.21

Drawdowns

SSMAX vs. LDRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMAX drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than LDRAX's maximum drawdown of -37.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMAX and LDRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSMAXLDRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.31%

-37.23%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-5.34%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.61%

-14.49%

-10.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.45%

-36.35%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.23%

-37.23%

-4.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-22.50%

+21.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-12.39%

+2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.12%

+0.50%

Volatility

SSMAX vs. LDRAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (SSMAX) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX) at 2.66%. This indicates that SSMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSMAXLDRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

2.66%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

5.70%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

8.08%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.20%

12.54%

+6.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

11.40%

+9.35%

SSMAX vs. LDRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRAX's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSMAX vs. LDRAX - Dividend Comparison

SSMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than LDRAX's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDRAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund
5.15%5.04%4.62%3.42%3.23%4.30%12.32%8.60%4.80%4.46%6.21%9.23%
SSMAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund
6.97%7.73%7.95%1.02%7.76%29.28%3.90%6.69%25.14%12.23%4.94%17.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSMAX and LDRAX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSMAX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to LDRAX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSMAX dropped -58.31% vs LDRAX's -37.23%.

SSMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSMAX and LDRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer