PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSLN.L vs. XSLE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSLN.L vs. XSLE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XSLE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SSLN.L is traded in GBp, while XSLE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XSLE.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a -15.38% return, which is significantly higher than XSLE.DE's -27.13% return.


SSLN.L

1D
3.08%
1M
-20.04%
YTD
-15.38%
6M
-20.49%
1Y
71.23%
3Y*
35.76%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
11.54%

XSLE.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-24.53%
YTD
-27.13%
6M
-27.13%
1Y
53.82%
3Y*
31.40%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSLN.L vs. XSLE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SSLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC
-15.38%130.26%23.21%-6.20%15.75%-11.83%51.80%
XSLE.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities
-27.13%162.25%14.91%-6.76%5.78%-21.27%69.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SSLN.L and XSLE.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2020

0.91

The correlation between SSLN.L and XSLE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSLN.L vs. XSLE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSLN.L
SSLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XSLE.DE
XSLE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XSLE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSLN.L vs. XSLE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XSLE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSLN.LXSLE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

1.06

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.40

2.38

+1.03

SSLN.L vs. XSLE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the XSLE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSLN.L and XSLE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSLN.L vs. XSLE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -78.44%, which is greater than XSLE.DE's maximum drawdown of -50.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and XSLE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSLN.LXSLE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.44%

-50.63%

-27.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.19%

-50.63%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.19%

-50.63%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.19%

-50.63%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.56%

-50.63%

+5.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-21.00%

-38.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.86%

22.58%

-1.72%

Volatility

SSLN.L vs. XSLE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XSLE.DE) have volatilities of 14.91% and 15.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSLN.LXSLE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.91%

15.37%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.08%

54.86%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.25%

58.26%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.68%

35.60%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.05%

35.59%

-4.54%

SSLN.L vs. XSLE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XSLE.DE's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSLN.L vs. XSLE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSLN.L nor XSLE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SSLN.L and XSLE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for XSLE.DE.

SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while XSLE.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSLN.L and 0.73% for XSLE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and XSLE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer