PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSLN.L vs. XPPT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSLN.L vs. XPPT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SSLN.L is traded in GBp, while XPPT.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XPPT.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a -15.38% return, which is significantly higher than XPPT.DE's -28.05% return.


SSLN.L

1D
3.08%
1M
-20.04%
YTD
-15.38%
6M
-20.49%
1Y
71.23%
3Y*
35.76%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
11.54%

XPPT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-16.54%
YTD
-28.05%
6M
-28.05%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSLN.L vs. XPPT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SSLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC
-15.38%130.26%23.21%-6.20%15.75%-11.83%56.81%
XPPT.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities
-28.05%125.60%-7.56%-10.75%22.56%-8.85%13.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SSLN.L and XPPT.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.55

The correlation between SSLN.L and XPPT.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSLN.L vs. XPPT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSLN.L
SSLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XPPT.DE
XPPT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSLN.L vs. XPPT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSLN.LXPPT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.13

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

0.52

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.40

1.11

+2.30

SSLN.L vs. XPPT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSLN.L and XPPT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSLN.L vs. XPPT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -78.44%, which is greater than XPPT.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and XPPT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSLN.LXPPT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.44%

-42.69%

-35.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.19%

-42.69%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.19%

-42.69%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.19%

-42.69%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.56%

-42.69%

-2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-15.94%

-43.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.86%

19.93%

+0.93%

Volatility

SSLN.L vs. XPPT.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a higher volatility of 14.91% compared to Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) at 10.57%. This indicates that SSLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPPT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSLN.LXPPT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.91%

10.57%

+4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.08%

38.89%

+14.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.25%

49.71%

+6.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.68%

31.57%

+5.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.05%

32.04%

-0.99%

SSLN.L vs. XPPT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XPPT.DE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSLN.L vs. XPPT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSLN.L nor XPPT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SSLN.L and XPPT.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for XPPT.DE.

SSLN.L is categorized as Silver, while XPPT.DE is Precious Metals. SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while XPPT.DE tracks Platinum. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSLN.L and 0.38% for XPPT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and XPPT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer