SSLN.L vs. XLKQ.L
SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L returned 16.71%/yr vs 27.22%/yr for XLKQ.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSLN.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 16.71%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.22% annualized return.
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 28.32%
- 1Y
- 115.93%
- 3Y*
- 42.31%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 14.41%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 22.31%
- 1Y
- 54.52%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 26.60%
- 10Y*
- 27.22%
SSLN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 3.18% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.64% | 40.73% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -5.59% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 23.81% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 36.28% | 37.93% | 44.63% | 0.92% | 23.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and XLKQ.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLN.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSLN.L
XLKQ.L
SSLN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLN.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.46 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.24 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 8.42 | -1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLN.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.83 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 1.21 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 1.33 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.33 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -28.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLN.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.95% | -28.74% | -41.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.72% | -16.76% | -21.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.72% | -28.74% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | -28.74% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | -28.74% | -9.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.62% | -2.84% | -30.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.32% | -5.04% | -40.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.69% | 6.45% | +11.24% |
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a higher volatility of 16.31% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) at 6.83%. This indicates that SSLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLN.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.31% | 6.83% | +9.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.81% | 14.29% | +37.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.53% | 19.18% | +35.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.31% | 22.04% | +11.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 21.65% | +8.04% |
SSLN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLN.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSLN.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSLN.L.
SSLN.L is categorized as Silver, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSLN.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer