SSLN.L vs. VEVE.AS
SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) and VEVE.AS (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while VEVE.AS is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L returned 16.77%/yr vs 14.18%/yr for VEVE.AS. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSLN.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VEVE.AS.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. VEVE.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSLN.L is traded in GBp, while VEVE.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VEVE.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than VEVE.AS's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L has outperformed VEVE.AS with an annualized return of 16.77%, while VEVE.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 14.18% annualized return.
SSLN.L
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 23.96%
- 1Y
- 113.86%
- 3Y*
- 41.85%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 16.77%
VEVE.AS
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 30.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
SSLN.L vs. VEVE.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 2.69% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.64% | 40.73% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -5.59% |
VEVE.AS Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF | 12.18% | 14.01% | 20.59% | 17.00% | -8.72% | 23.67% | 12.52% | 22.06% | -3.91% | 13.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and VEVE.AS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014 | 0.12 |
The correlation between SSLN.L and VEVE.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLN.L vs. VEVE.AS — Risk / Return Rank
SSLN.L
VEVE.AS
SSLN.L vs. VEVE.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (VEVE.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLN.L | VEVE.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.53 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 4.40 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 17.77 | -11.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLN.L | VEVE.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.82 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.98 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.80 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.39 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. VEVE.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, which is greater than VEVE.AS's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and VEVE.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLN.L | VEVE.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.95% | -26.14% | -43.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.72% | -6.81% | -31.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.72% | -19.06% | -19.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | -19.06% | -19.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | -26.14% | -12.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.93% | -0.28% | -33.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.32% | -6.18% | -39.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.56% | 1.70% | +15.86% |
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. VEVE.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a higher volatility of 16.55% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (VEVE.AS) at 3.29%. This indicates that SSLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEVE.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLN.L | VEVE.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.55% | 3.29% | +13.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.03% | 7.75% | +44.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.53% | 10.65% | +43.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.31% | 13.46% | +19.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.70% | 17.49% | +12.21% |
SSLN.L vs. VEVE.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VEVE.AS's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. VEVE.AS - Dividend Comparison
SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEVE.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEVE.AS Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF | 1.23% | 1.41% | 1.46% | 1.73% | 2.04% | 1.43% | 1.61% | 1.89% | 2.28% | 1.97% | 1.98% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSLN.L and VEVE.AS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEVE.AS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEVE.AS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSLN.L.
SSLN.L is categorized as Silver, while VEVE.AS is Global Equities. SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while VEVE.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSLN.L and 0.12% for VEVE.AS.
Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and VEVE.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer