SSLN.L vs. SVR.TO
SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) and SVR.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF) are both Silver funds from iShares tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L returned 11.54%/yr vs 8.86%/yr for SVR.TO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSLN.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SVR.TO.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. SVR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSLN.L is traded in GBp, while SVR.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a -15.38% return, which is significantly higher than SVR.TO's -20.09% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L has outperformed SVR.TO with an annualized return of 11.54%, while SVR.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.86% annualized return.
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -20.04%
- YTD
- -15.38%
- 6M
- -20.49%
- 1Y
- 71.23%
- 3Y*
- 35.76%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
SVR.TO
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -23.78%
- YTD
- -20.09%
- 6M
- -25.15%
- 1Y
- 56.72%
- 3Y*
- 29.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
SSLN.L vs. SVR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -15.38% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.83% | 41.04% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -5.59% |
SVR.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | -20.09% | 134.11% | 11.36% | -3.59% | 5.31% | -12.16% | 42.14% | 13.14% | -11.57% | 2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and SVR.TO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.71 |
The correlation between SSLN.L and SVR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLN.L vs. SVR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SSLN.L
SVR.TO
SSLN.L vs. SVR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSLN.L | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.22 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 1.10 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 2.50 | +0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. SVR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -78.44%, roughly equal to the maximum SVR.TO drawdown of -79.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and SVR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLN.L | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.44% | -79.28% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.19% | -51.98% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.19% | -51.98% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.19% | -51.98% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.19% | -51.98% | +4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.56% | -50.21% | +4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -54.09% | -5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.86% | 22.80% | -1.94% |
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. SVR.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO) have volatilities of 14.91% and 15.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLN.L | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.91% | 15.64% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.08% | 55.78% | -2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.25% | 58.48% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.68% | 35.48% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.05% | 31.77% | -0.72% |
SSLN.L vs. SVR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SVR.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. SVR.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLN.L nor SVR.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSLN.L and SVR.TO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR.TO.
Both ETFs track LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSLN.L and 0.66% for SVR.TO.
Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and SVR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer