SSLN.L vs. SLVI.L
SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) and SLVI.L (IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP) are both Silver funds. SSLN.L is passively managed, while SLVI.L is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSLN.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SLVI.L.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. SLVI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSLN.L is traded in GBp, while SLVI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly higher than SLVI.L's -3.28% return.
SSLN.L
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 23.96%
- 1Y
- 113.86%
- 3Y*
- 41.85%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 16.77%
SLVI.L
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSLN.L vs. SLVI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 2.69% | 102.36% |
SLVI.L IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP | -3.28% | 76.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and SLVI.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLN.L vs. SLVI.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSLN.L
SLVI.L
SSLN.L vs. SLVI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP (SLVI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLN.L | SLVI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLN.L | SLVI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.55 | -1.38 |
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. SLVI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, which is greater than SLVI.L's maximum drawdown of -35.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and SLVI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLN.L | SLVI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.95% | -35.73% | -34.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.93% | -32.57% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.32% | -11.31% | -34.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.56% | — | — |
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. SLVI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLN.L | SLVI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.53% | 50.13% | +4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.31% | 50.13% | -16.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.70% | 50.13% | -20.43% |
SSLN.L vs. SLVI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVI.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. SLVI.L - Dividend Comparison
SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SLVI.L IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP | 0.11% | 0.02% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SSLN.L and SLVI.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SLVI.L.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and IncomeShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSLN.L and 0.35% for SLVI.L.
Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and SLVI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer