SSLN.L vs. LUNR
SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SSLN.L returned 38.49%/yr vs 39.37%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSLN.L is traded in GBp, while LUNR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LUNR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a -5.21% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.85% return.
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 5.29%
- 1M
- -22.94%
- YTD
- -5.21%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- 1Y
- 88.53%
- 3Y*
- 38.49%
- 5Y*
- 20.27%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
LUNR
- 1D
- -13.04%
- 1M
- -24.74%
- YTD
- 64.85%
- 6M
- 121.84%
- 1Y
- 148.32%
- 3Y*
- 39.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSLN.L vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -5.21% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -7.72% |
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 64.85% | -16.99% | 623.18% | -75.73% | 16.07% | -0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and LUNR is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLN.L vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank
SSLN.L
LUNR
SSLN.L vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSLN.L | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 3.59 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 7.53 | -2.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -78.44%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and LUNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLN.L | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.44% | -97.56% | +19.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.08% | -41.62% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.08% | -78.29% | +36.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.02% | -70.83% | +31.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.69% | -64.78% | +5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.73% | 19.77% | -1.04% |
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) is 14.40%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.53%. This indicates that SSLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLN.L | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.40% | 42.53% | -28.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.43% | 92.39% | -39.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.28% | 110.12% | -54.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 171.63% | -135.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 171.63% | -140.49% |
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLN.L nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSLN.L and LUNR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and LUNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer