SSLN.L vs. IITU.L
SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L returned 16.77%/yr vs 27.67%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSLN.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 25.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 16.77%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.67% annualized return.
SSLN.L
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 23.96%
- 1Y
- 113.86%
- 3Y*
- 41.85%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 16.77%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 18.53%
- YTD
- 25.87%
- 6M
- 24.64%
- 1Y
- 56.89%
- 3Y*
- 32.15%
- 5Y*
- 26.03%
- 10Y*
- 27.67%
SSLN.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 2.69% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.64% | 40.73% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -5.59% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 25.87% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and IITU.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLN.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSLN.L
IITU.L
SSLN.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLN.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.48 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.38 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 8.71 | -2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLN.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.91 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.19 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 1.30 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.24 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLN.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.95% | -28.03% | -41.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.72% | -16.76% | -21.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.72% | -28.03% | -10.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | -28.03% | -10.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | -28.03% | -10.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.93% | -0.83% | -33.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.32% | -5.14% | -40.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.56% | 6.51% | +11.05% |
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a higher volatility of 16.55% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) at 6.45%. This indicates that SSLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLN.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.55% | 6.45% | +10.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.03% | 14.27% | +37.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.53% | 19.57% | +34.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.31% | 21.93% | +11.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.70% | 21.31% | +8.39% |
SSLN.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLN.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSLN.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSLN.L.
SSLN.L is categorized as Silver, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSLN.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer