PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSLN.L vs. COPJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSLN.L vs. COPJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SSLN.L is traded in GBp, while COPJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPJ values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a -15.38% return, which is significantly lower than COPJ's 2.56% return.


SSLN.L

1D
3.08%
1M
-20.04%
YTD
-15.38%
6M
-20.49%
1Y
71.23%
3Y*
35.76%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
11.54%

COPJ

1D
2.50%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
2.56%
6M
1.56%
1Y
89.21%
3Y*
36.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSLN.L vs. COPJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SSLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC
-15.38%130.26%23.21%-2.91%
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
2.56%123.48%13.01%-10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SSLN.L and COPJ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.45

The correlation between SSLN.L and COPJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSLN.L vs. COPJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSLN.L
SSLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

COPJ
COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSLN.L vs. COPJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSLN.LCOPJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

3.00

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.40

8.24

-4.84

SSLN.L vs. COPJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the COPJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSLN.L and COPJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSLN.L vs. COPJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -78.44%, which is greater than COPJ's maximum drawdown of -30.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and COPJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSLN.LCOPJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.44%

-30.66%

-47.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.19%

-29.91%

-17.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.19%

-30.66%

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.56%

-19.64%

-25.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-12.42%

-47.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.86%

10.86%

+10.00%

Volatility

SSLN.L vs. COPJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) is 14.91%, while Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) has a volatility of 18.01%. This indicates that SSLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSLN.LCOPJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.91%

18.01%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.08%

36.41%

+16.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.25%

42.87%

+13.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.68%

33.51%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.05%

33.51%

-2.46%

SSLN.L vs. COPJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than COPJ's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSLN.L vs. COPJ - Dividend Comparison

SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.48%.


PositionTTM202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
11.48%11.57%11.64%2.48%
SSLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSLN.L and COPJ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.

SSLN.L is categorized as Silver, while COPJ is Copper. SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSLN.L and 0.78% for COPJ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and COPJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer