SSG vs. TSLQ
SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) and TSLQ (AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%), while TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS. SSG is passively managed, while TSLQ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SSG returned -74.84%/yr vs -68.13%/yr for TSLQ. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSG charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for TSLQ.
Performance
SSG vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSG achieves a -60.94% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's -3.74% return.
SSG
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -33.91%
- YTD
- -60.94%
- 6M
- -61.42%
- 1Y
- -81.06%
- 3Y*
- -74.84%
- 5Y*
- -66.94%
- 10Y*
- -62.12%
TSLQ
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -17.27%
- YTD
- -3.74%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- -62.40%
- 3Y*
- -68.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSG vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -60.94% | -70.03% | -77.59% | -78.69% | -13.93% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | -3.74% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -59.97% | 63.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSG and TSLQ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSG vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank
SSG
TSLQ
SSG vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSG | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | -0.67 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.11 | -0.84 | -2.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.67 | 0.91 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.82 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.60 | -1.05 | -0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSG | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.32 | -0.67 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | -0.65 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
SSG vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSG and TSLQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSG | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -98.73% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.36% | -75.93% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.49% | -97.85% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -98.57% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.59% | -67.19% | -21.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.50% | 59.63% | -9.13% |
Volatility
SSG vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) is 21.44%, while AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a volatility of 24.10%. This indicates that SSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSG | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.44% | 24.10% | -2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.41% | 54.84% | -7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.80% | 92.69% | -30.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.33% | 94.11% | -16.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.97% | 94.11% | -25.14% |
SSG vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLQ's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSG vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison
SSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.36%, more than TSLQ's 10.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 13.36% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | 10.97% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSG and TSLQ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (24.10%) compared to SSG (21.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSG dropped -100.00% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.
On 3-year performance, TSLQ leads with -68.13% vs -74.84% for SSG. On fees, SSG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SSG has been the lower-risk option at 21.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TSLQ has performed better with a -68.13% return vs -74.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSLQ.
SSG has the higher dividend yield at 13.36%, compared with 10.97% for TSLQ.
SSG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLQ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSG and 1.15% for TSLQ.
TSLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSG and TSLQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer