SSG vs. TQQQ
SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SSG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSG returned -62.09%/yr vs 45.48%/yr for TQQQ. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SSG vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSG achieves a -58.97% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 41.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SSG has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -62.09%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.48% annualized return.
SSG
- 1D
- 12.02%
- 1M
- -11.92%
- YTD
- -58.97%
- 6M
- -57.87%
- 1Y
- -78.94%
- 3Y*
- -74.04%
- 5Y*
- -66.24%
- 10Y*
- -62.09%
TQQQ
- 1D
- -9.86%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 41.43%
- 6M
- 35.75%
- 1Y
- 100.69%
- 3Y*
- 58.02%
- 5Y*
- 21.47%
- 10Y*
- 45.48%
SSG vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -58.97% | -70.03% | -77.59% | -78.69% | 37.90% | -67.46% | -76.50% | -63.33% | -0.79% | -51.60% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 41.43% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSG and TQQQ is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.81 |
The correlation between SSG and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.86 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSG vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSG
TQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SSG
TQQQ
Basic Materials
SSG
-
TQQQ
Communication Services
SSG
-
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SSG
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
SSG
-
TQQQ
Energy
SSG
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
SSG
-
TQQQ
Industrials
SSG
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
SSG
-
TQQQ
Technology
SSG
-
TQQQ
Utilities
SSG
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSG vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SSG
TQQQ
SSG vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSG | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.30 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 2.74 | -3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 8.72 | -10.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSG vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSG and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSG | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -81.66% | -18.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.92% | -36.97% | -42.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.56% | -58.04% | -40.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.66% | -81.66% | -18.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | -81.66% | -18.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -14.65% | -85.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.60% | -18.49% | -70.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.14% | 11.59% | +39.55% |
Volatility
SSG vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) has a higher volatility of 33.37% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 27.27%. This indicates that SSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSG | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.37% | 27.27% | +6.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.63% | 43.35% | +11.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.68% | 53.39% | +15.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.55% | 67.41% | +11.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.63% | 66.32% | +3.31% |
SSG vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SSG and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SSG vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, more than TQQQ's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 12.72% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.42% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSG and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSG has higher volatility (33.37%) compared to TQQQ (27.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSG dropped -100.00% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.48% vs -62.09% for SSG. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 27.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.48% return vs -62.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSG and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SSG has the higher dividend yield at 12.72%, compared with 0.42% for TQQQ.
SSG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSG and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer