PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSG vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSG vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSG achieves a -57.62% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's -4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SSG has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of -61.87%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.


SSG

1D
-2.05%
1M
-8.96%
YTD
-57.62%
6M
-60.52%
1Y
-79.15%
3Y*
-73.33%
5Y*
-66.38%
10Y*
-61.87%

SLV

1D
0.77%
1M
-11.23%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
9.25%
1Y
85.90%
3Y*
41.27%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
13.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSG vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSG
Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors
-57.62%-70.03%-77.59%-78.69%37.90%-67.46%-76.50%-63.33%-0.79%-51.60%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-4.86%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SSG and SLV is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSG vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSG
SSG Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSG Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSG Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSG vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSGSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.72

1.29

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

1.89

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.52

4.10

-5.62

SSG vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSG Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSG and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSG vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSG and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSGSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-76.28%

-23.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-81.04%

-45.40%

-35.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.49%

-45.40%

-53.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.64%

-45.40%

-54.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

-45.40%

-54.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-41.96%

-58.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.59%

-44.66%

-43.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

51.46%

20.88%

+30.58%

Volatility

SSG vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) has a higher volatility of 28.87% compared to iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at 16.34%. This indicates that SSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSGSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.87%

16.34%

+12.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.78%

59.10%

-6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.95%

59.82%

+6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.00%

36.46%

+41.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.35%

32.00%

+37.35%

SSG vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSG vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

SSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.32%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSG
Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors
12.32%9.19%7.67%6.73%0.75%0.00%0.34%1.81%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSG and SLV have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSG has higher volatility (28.87%) compared to SLV (16.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSG dropped -100.00% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 13.99% vs -61.87% for SSG. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SLV has been the lower-risk option at 16.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 13.99% return vs -61.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSG.

SSG has the higher dividend yield at 12.32%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

SSG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SLV is Silver. SSG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%), while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSG and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSG and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer