SSG vs. MU
SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%), while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SSG returned -62.12%/yr vs 56.13%/yr for MU. At a correlation of -0.69, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
SSG vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSG achieves a -60.94% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 278.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SSG has underperformed MU with an annualized return of -62.12%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 56.13% annualized return.
SSG
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -33.91%
- YTD
- -60.94%
- 6M
- -61.42%
- 1Y
- -81.06%
- 3Y*
- -74.84%
- 5Y*
- -66.94%
- 10Y*
- -62.12%
MU
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 87.28%
- YTD
- 278.41%
- 6M
- 361.42%
- 1Y
- 958.34%
- 3Y*
- 150.98%
- 5Y*
- 67.58%
- 10Y*
- 56.13%
SSG vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -60.94% | -70.03% | -77.59% | -78.69% | 37.90% | -67.46% | -76.50% | -63.33% | -0.79% | -51.60% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 278.41% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSG and MU is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | -0.69 |
The correlation between SSG and MU shifts across timeframes, from -0.72 (10 years) to -0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSG vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
SSG
MU
SSG vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -10.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.67 | 1.94 | -1.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 31.98 | -32.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.60 | 126.47 | -128.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.32 | 14.69 | -16.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.87 | 1.30 | -2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.90 | 1.13 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | 0.31 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
SSG vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSG and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -98.25% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.36% | -30.28% | -51.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.49% | -57.63% | -40.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.64% | -57.63% | -42.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | -57.63% | -42.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | 0.00% | -100.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.59% | -58.20% | -30.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.50% | 7.64% | +42.86% |
Volatility
SSG vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) is 21.44%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 28.51%. This indicates that SSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.44% | 28.51% | -7.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.41% | 53.48% | -6.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.80% | 66.00% | -4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.33% | 52.31% | +25.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.97% | 49.66% | +19.31% |
Dividends
SSG vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
SSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.36%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 13.36% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSG and MU have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (28.51%) compared to SSG (21.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSG dropped -100.00% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.69 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSG and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer