SSG vs. MAGS

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%), while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. SSG is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SSG returned -72.05%/yr vs 31.30%/yr for MAGS. At a correlation of -0.71, they often move in opposite directions. SSG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.

Performance

SSG vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSG achieves a -54.76% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's 1.47% return.

SSG

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 22.52%
• 6M: -50.10%
• YTD: -54.76%
• 1Y: -69.06%
• 3Y*: -72.05%
• 5Y*: -65.35%
• 10Y*: -60.97%
• ALL TIME*: -48.61%

MAGS

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 2.28%
• 6M: 3.13%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 1Y: 18.75%
• 3Y*: 31.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 36.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSG vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors	-54.76%	-70.03%	-77.59%	-60.06%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.47%	22.99%	63.97%	35.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SSG and MAGS is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023	-0.71

The correlation between SSG and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.72 to -0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

SSG vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SSG	MAGS
Financial Services	103.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	13.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SSG vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSG

SSG Risk / Return Rank: 1
SSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SSG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SSG Martin Ratio Rank: 0

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 30
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSG vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSG	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	0.88	-1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.77	1.31	-3.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.16	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	1.01	-1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.54	3.11	-4.65

SSG vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSG Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSG and MAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SSG vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSG and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSG	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-29.91%	-70.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.13%	-18.62%	-57.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.56%	-29.91%	-68.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-5.65%	-94.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.65%	-4.81%	-83.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.89%	6.04%	+38.85%

Volatility

SSG vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) has a higher volatility of 30.08% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 7.49%. This indicates that SSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSG	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.08%	7.49%	+22.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.01%	16.68%	+42.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.46%	21.47%	+50.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.16%	26.00%	+53.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.96%	26.00%	+43.96%

SSG vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSG vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

SSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.01%, more than MAGS's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.46%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors	9.01%	9.19%	7.67%	6.73%	0.75%	0.00%	0.34%	1.81%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSG and MAGS in my portfolio?

SSG and MAGS have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSG or MAGS?

SSG has higher volatility (30.08%) compared to MAGS (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSG dropped -100.00% vs MAGS's -29.91%.

Which ETF is better, SSG or MAGS?

On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 31.30% vs -72.05% for SSG. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 7.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SSG or MAGS?

Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 31.30% return vs -72.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSG or MAGS?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSG or MAGS?

SSG has the higher dividend yield at 9.01%, compared with 1.46% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between SSG and MAGS?

SSG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSG and 0.29% for MAGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.