SSG vs. BMNG
SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SSG is passively managed, while BMNG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. SSG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.
Performance
SSG vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSG achieves a -63.37% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -79.32% return.
SSG
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -21.37%
- YTD
- -63.37%
- 6M
- -63.97%
- 1Y
- -81.41%
- 3Y*
- -75.00%
- 5Y*
- -67.22%
- 10Y*
- -62.52%
BMNG
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- -34.35%
- YTD
- -79.32%
- 6M
- -84.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSG vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -63.37% | -5.91% |
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -79.32% | -80.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSG and BMNG is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSG vs. BMNG — Risk / Return Rank
SSG
BMNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SSG vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSG | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.69 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.60 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSG vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum BMNG drawdown of -96.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSG and BMNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSG | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -96.19% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -96.15% | -3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.60% | -81.95% | -6.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.37% | — | — |
Volatility
SSG vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSG | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.65% | 189.65% | -122.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.35% | 189.65% | -111.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.58% | 189.65% | -120.07% |
SSG vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSG vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison
SSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.25%, while BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 14.25% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSG and BMNG have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSG.
SSG has the higher dividend yield at 14.25%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSG and 0.75% for BMNG.
Find the right allocation for SSG and BMNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer