PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSFNX vs. LTTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSFNX vs. LTTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement Fund (SSFNX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSFNX achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly higher than LTTIX's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SSFNX has underperformed LTTIX with an annualized return of 5.84%, while LTTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.24% annualized return.


SSFNX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.51%
YTD
5.13%
6M
5.28%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
5.84%

LTTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.15%
YTD
2.74%
6M
2.84%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
6.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSFNX vs. LTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSFNX
State Street Target Retirement Fund
5.13%10.93%7.05%10.73%-12.21%6.87%10.26%13.97%-2.49%8.92%
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
2.74%9.29%6.73%10.36%-12.36%8.61%10.61%17.82%-3.97%13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SSFNX and LTTIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.94

The correlation between SSFNX and LTTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSFNX vs. LTTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSFNX
SSFNX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SSFNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSFNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSFNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SSFNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSFNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

LTTIX
LTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSFNX vs. LTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement Fund (SSFNX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSFNXLTTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.42

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.47

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.06

10.68

+4.37

SSFNX vs. LTTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSFNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the LTTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSFNX and LTTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSFNX vs. LTTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSFNX drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, smaller than the maximum LTTIX drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSFNX and LTTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSFNXLTTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.62%

-19.33%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-3.64%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.40%

-5.77%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.62%

-16.92%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.62%

-19.33%

+2.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.45%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-2.68%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.84%

-0.05%

Volatility

SSFNX vs. LTTIX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Target Retirement Fund (SSFNX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) at 1.34%. This indicates that SSFNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSFNXLTTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

1.34%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.91%

3.32%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

4.18%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

6.37%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.58%

7.24%

-0.66%

SSFNX vs. LTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSFNX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than LTTIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSFNX vs. LTTIX - Dividend Comparison

SSFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than LTTIX's 11.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
11.54%8.13%7.07%3.30%5.88%7.35%2.83%3.68%4.32%3.51%4.03%1.82%
SSFNX
State Street Target Retirement Fund
4.63%4.86%5.78%5.26%5.12%6.69%1.61%3.35%4.40%2.72%1.84%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSFNX and LTTIX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSFNX has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to LTTIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSFNX dropped -16.62% vs LTTIX's -19.33%.

SSFNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSFNX and LTTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer